11:2 traditions
11:3 christ head of man, man head of woman, god head of christ
11:4-7 head coverings for women not men
11:4 disgrace for men to have one
11:5 disgrace for women not to have one
11:6 if no headcovering for women, it is as though her head was shaved
11:7 men ought not to wear headcoverings since man is over woman
11:8 man does not originate from women but women from man (eve from adam)
11:9 eve was created for adam not vice versa
11:10 ??? therefore a woman should have a headcovering because of the angels ???
11:11,12 the equality of men and women
11:11 man is not independent of woman nor woman of man
11:12 man also has his origin in woman
11:13-15 head coverings again...
11:13 judge for yourselves : is it proper to not have a headcovering?
11:14 does not nature teach that long hair is a dishonor to man?
11:15 long hair is a glory to women
11:16 But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice
comments :
my desire is have this be a cultural reading, so please filter my arguments carefully...
a. v4-6 initial arguments presented
v4 disgrace for men to have one
v5 disgrace for women not to have one
v6 if no headcovering for women, it is as though her head was shaved
v7 men ought not to wear headcoverings since man is over woman
c. other considerations
1. not mentioned or repeated elsewhere in scripture
a. subordinate in role (as christ to the father)
11:3 christ -> man, man -> woman, god -> christ
please notice the care that paul takes to express the womans role as similar
to that of christ!
b. equal (as christ to the father)
pauls pattern of establishing both role and equality...
c. specifics
1. teaching / authority in the church
1 tim...
2. marriage
col 3 / eph 5